Greetings,
The linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) tree has been moved to v3.6-rc5 base. All the topics existed in the 12.08 version of llct have been carried over into the updated tree with few easy to resolve conflicts. The only one which needs attention is due to commit "ASoC: Samsung: Fix build error" [1]. In fact I had to revert it because it doesn't work with the multiplatform topic (the latter renames all the arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach dirs to arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach-<name>). Sachin or Tushar, could you take a look please? Also the big-LITTLE-MP topic has been updated to v3.6-rc5 based big-LITTLE-MP-v8. The current list of the llct topics can be found in [2].
12.09 will most probably be v3.6-rc6 based. But for the moment I've tried rebasing the linux-linaro (ll) tree to the current v3.6-rc5 based llct, and encountered no merge issues. The current list of the ll topics can be found in [3]. The plan is to have single topic from the ARM LT (like the Samsung LT code is represented now) this month vs several one-per-feature topics.
In 12.08 the linux-linaro-tracking (llt) tree was v3.4 based, and had recent code from TI LT plus the older code (no changes for couple months) from ARM and Samsung LTs. Any changes here in 12.09? (Are we on v3.4 still, are there other LTs to add to this tree?). And yes, this month llc-3.4 "core stable" tree will be introduced (first of all, to get the Gator updates for v3.4, and some critical fixes), and llt will start using it as a base. No more details atm, should have something in git by the end of this week.
Please let me know if there are any updates to the existing topics, or new topics missing. And if there are obsoleted topics. The linux-linaro and linux-linaro-tracking trees will be frozen (only bug fixes would be accepted afterwards, no new additions) by the end of September 18.
Thanks, Andrey
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git%3Ba=commitdiff%...
[2] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-manifest.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf...
[3] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-manifest.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf...
On 12 September 2012 17:56, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konovalov@linaro.org wrote:
Greetings,
The linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) tree has been moved to v3.6-rc5 base. All the topics existed in the 12.08 version of llct have been carried over into the updated tree with few easy to resolve conflicts. The only one which needs attention is due to commit "ASoC: Samsung: Fix build error" [1]. In fact I had to revert it because it doesn't work with the multiplatform topic (the latter renames all the arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach dirs to arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach-<name>). Sachin or Tushar, could you take a look please?
Thanks for bringing this to notice. Will check and let you know.
Also the big-LITTLE-MP topic has been updated to v3.6-rc5 based big-LITTLE-MP-v8. The current list of the llct topics can be found in [2].
12.09 will most probably be v3.6-rc6 based. But for the moment I've tried rebasing the linux-linaro (ll) tree to the current v3.6-rc5 based llct, and encountered no merge issues. The current list of the ll topics can be found in [3]. The plan is to have single topic from the ARM LT (like the Samsung LT code is represented now) this month vs several one-per-feature topics.
In 12.08 the linux-linaro-tracking (llt) tree was v3.4 based, and had recent code from TI LT plus the older code (no changes for couple months) from ARM and Samsung LTs. Any changes here in 12.09? (Are we on v3.4 still, are there other LTs to add to this tree?). And yes, this month llc-3.4 "core stable" tree will be introduced (first of all, to get the Gator updates for v3.4, and some critical fixes), and llt will start using it as a base. No more details atm, should have something in git by the end of this week.
Please let me know if there are any updates to the existing topics, or new topics missing. And if there are obsoleted topics. The linux-linaro and linux-linaro-tracking trees will be frozen (only bug fixes would be accepted afterwards, no new additions) by the end of September 18.
Thanks, Andrey
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git%3Ba=commitdiff%...
[2] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-manifest.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf...
[3] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-manifest.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf...
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Hi Andrey,
On 12 September 2012 17:56, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konovalov@linaro.org wrote:
Greetings,
The linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) tree has been moved to v3.6-rc5 base. All the topics existed in the 12.08 version of llct have been carried over into the updated tree with few easy to resolve conflicts. The only one which needs attention is due to commit "ASoC: Samsung: Fix build error" [1]. In fact I had to revert it because it doesn't work with the multiplatform topic (the latter renames all the arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach dirs to arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach-<name>). Sachin or Tushar, could you take a look please?
CC'd Arnd.
<mach/dma.h> present in some Samsung driver files esp. related to audio haven't been converted to <mach-<name>/dma.h> form mainly because most Samsung mach-* directories have a dma.h file and those need to be consolidated first. Kukjin's team is working on cleaning this up. See the below link
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12049
With the fix patch reverted, you will get build errors if you enable pcm. However if you do not intend to enable pcm you may go ahead with it. Alternatively, you may replace <mach/dma.h> with <mach-exynos/dma.h> for your purpose (stopgap solution).
Also the big-LITTLE-MP topic has been updated to v3.6-rc5 based big-LITTLE-MP-v8. The current list of the llct topics can be found in [2].
12.09 will most probably be v3.6-rc6 based. But for the moment I've tried rebasing the linux-linaro (ll) tree to the current v3.6-rc5 based llct, and encountered no merge issues. The current list of the ll topics can be found in [3]. The plan is to have single topic from the ARM LT (like the Samsung LT code is represented now) this month vs several one-per-feature topics.
In 12.08 the linux-linaro-tracking (llt) tree was v3.4 based, and had recent code from TI LT plus the older code (no changes for couple months) from ARM and Samsung LTs. Any changes here in 12.09? (Are we on v3.4 still, are there other LTs to add to this tree?). And yes, this month llc-3.4 "core stable" tree will be introduced (first of all, to get the Gator updates for v3.4, and some critical fixes), and llt will start using it as a base. No more details atm, should have something in git by the end of this week.
Please let me know if there are any updates to the existing topics, or new topics missing. And if there are obsoleted topics. The linux-linaro and linux-linaro-tracking trees will be frozen (only bug fixes would be accepted afterwards, no new additions) by the end of September 18.
Thanks, Andrey
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git%3Ba=commitdiff%...
[2] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-manifest.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf...
[3] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-manifest.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf...
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Friday 14 September 2012, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On 12 September 2012 17:56, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konovalov@linaro.org wrote:
Greetings,
The linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) tree has been moved to v3.6-rc5 base. All the topics existed in the 12.08 version of llct have been carried over into the updated tree with few easy to resolve conflicts. The only one which needs attention is due to commit "ASoC: Samsung: Fix build error" [1]. In fact I had to revert it because it doesn't work with the multiplatform topic (the latter renames all the arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach dirs to arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach-<name>). Sachin or Tushar, could you take a look please?
CC'd Arnd.
<mach/dma.h> present in some Samsung driver files esp. related to audio haven't been converted to <mach-<name>/dma.h> form mainly because most Samsung mach-* directories have a dma.h file and those need to be consolidated first. Kukjin's team is working on cleaning this up. See the below link
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12049
With the fix patch reverted, you will get build errors if you enable pcm. However if you do not intend to enable pcm you may go ahead with it. Alternatively, you may replace <mach/dma.h> with <mach-exynos/dma.h> for your purpose (stopgap solution).
I think we need to discuss whether the multiplatform branch should still be included in the linux-linaro-core-tracking tree. At the ARM mini summit in San Diego, we discussed in length about how we want to get to actual multiplatform kernels, and decided *not* to use my testing/mach-headers branch. We could keep using it for a little longer, but I think eventually we will have do thing differently as upstream moves on, so we might decide to remove it right away.
Arnd
On 09/14/2012 01:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 14 September 2012, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Andrey,
On 12 September 2012 17:56, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konovalov@linaro.org wrote:
Greetings,
The linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) tree has been moved to v3.6-rc5 base. All the topics existed in the 12.08 version of llct have been carried over into the updated tree with few easy to resolve conflicts. The only one which needs attention is due to commit "ASoC: Samsung: Fix build error" [1]. In fact I had to revert it because it doesn't work with the multiplatform topic (the latter renames all the arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach dirs to arch/arm/mach-<name>/include/mach-<name>). Sachin or Tushar, could you take a look please?
CC'd Arnd.
<mach/dma.h> present in some Samsung driver files esp. related to audio haven't been converted to <mach-<name>/dma.h> form mainly because most Samsung mach-* directories have a dma.h file and those need to be consolidated first. Kukjin's team is working on cleaning this up. See the below link
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12049
With the fix patch reverted, you will get build errors if you enable pcm. However if you do not intend to enable pcm you may go ahead with it. Alternatively, you may replace <mach/dma.h> with <mach-exynos/dma.h> for your purpose (stopgap solution).
I think we need to discuss whether the multiplatform branch should still be included in the linux-linaro-core-tracking tree. At the ARM mini summit in San Diego, we discussed in length about how we want to get to actual multiplatform kernels, and decided *not* to use my testing/mach-headers branch. We could keep using it for a little longer, but I think eventually we will have do thing differently as upstream moves on, so we might decide to remove it right away.
Guess I'll make one or couple more linux-linaro-core-tracking tree updates using the "replace <mach/dma.h> with <mach-exynos/dma.h>" workaround just in case, and then drop the multiplatform from the following linux-linaro-core-tracking tree updates starting from Tuesday, Sept 18. (So that we could use any of the two variants for the 12.09) Does anyone mind?
Thanks, Andrey
Arnd
Greetings,
On 09/14/2012 01:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I think we need to discuss whether the multiplatform branch should still be included in the linux-linaro-core-tracking tree. At the ARM mini summit in San Diego, we discussed in length about how we want to get to actual multiplatform kernels, and decided *not* to use my testing/mach-headers branch. We could keep using it for a little longer, but I think eventually we will have do thing differently as upstream moves on, so we might decide to remove it right away.
The multiplatform topic is still present in 12.09, but it will be dropped next cycle. Current linux-linaro-core-tracking tree (the llct-20120924.0 tag) has it removed already.
Thanks, Andrey
-
Andrey Konovalov -
Arnd Bergmann -
Sachin Kamat