Armhf dynamic linker path
vapier at gentoo.org
Thu Apr 12 01:29:28 UTC 2012
On Wednesday 11 April 2012 03:37:56 Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:01:47 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > one of the downsides of traveling down a path and upstreaming as an after
> > thought
> You didn't really follow arm hardfloat progress in the past 2 years, did
> you (if you did you'd already be aware of attempts to get this thing
> upstreamed for more than a year).
i've only started following arm again as my last job (of 5+ years) was largely
> Honestly, I'm curious, are you speaking your personal opinion or on behalf
> of Gentoo? If the former then consider that we're trying to get consensus
> amongst distros not people, it's impossible to make everyone happy, but
> we'd be content to get distro people to agree on a standard.
considering i did the Gentoo/ARM port ~8 years ago and maintain the toolchain
on Gentoo for all arches, i have a fairly big incentive to keep things clean.
> proposing it. So, I guess something like:
> or using the ABI name:
> are the most likely candidates to be agreed by most distros, at least as I
> see it.
i can let the fine wording of the tuple in the filename be hammered out by
others. if we don't care about multilib, then /lib/ is fine, and as long is it
isn't crowed by subdir-cruft (i.e. /lib/<tuple>/), then i'm happy.
side note: you really need to fix your mailer. the lack of proper wrapping is
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the cross-distro