New build naming convention

[Patrik Ryd]

On 31 January 2012 12:02, Alexander Sack <asac at linaro.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mansson <tony.mansson at linaro.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > The full names are kind of cumbersome to use in everyday speech so I
> predict
> > nicknames :)
>
> Very good point. Do we want to set up nicknames proactively or just
> see what happens?
>

I suggest we call the snowball build Yeti since that was my suggestion for
the name of the board, but the jury selected snowball. :)

I think most of us will ignore ics, and gcc in the name and just call it
the upstream- or stable-snowball and so on.

And +1 on Jons comment about the order.

Do we really need all pf the builds? I think not only the names, but the
number of builds have caused some confusion. Didn't we have an idea that we
would try to reduce the number of manifests?

 /Patrik

>
> --
> Alexander Sack
> Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams
> http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-android mailing list
> linaro-android at lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-android/attachments/20120131/9232533f/attachment.html>