imx51 and CONFIG_NEON

[Amit Kucheria]

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin <dave.martin at linaro.org> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria at linaro.org> wrote:
>> >> I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
>> >>
>> >
>> > OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing.
>> >
>> > On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop platforms, your check
>> > is triggered, and at least on Babbage 2.0 /proc/cpuinfo and
>> > /proc/self/auxv reflect the absence of NEON correctly.  (I couldn't
>> > boot to an fs on the Pegatron platform --- in any case I had to bodge
>> > the machine ID passed by the bootloader to persuage the kernel to
>> > boot).
>> >
>> > On Babbage 3.0, NEON is reported as present in /proc/cpuinfo and
>> > /proc/self/auxv.
>> >
>> > See the attached logs.
>>
>> Nico,
>>
>> I've got 2 confirmations that this works. Do you want to go ahead and
>> push the patch to RMK? You can also push my patch if you need an
>> example of what your patch is used for. (Please keep me in cc)
>
> OK.  Could you summarize whom those confirmations come from so to add
> Tested-by tags to the patches?

Tested-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin at linaro.org>
Tested-by: Jason Hui <jason.hui at linaro.org>