powertop patches

Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria at linaro.org
Mon Sep 13 09:51:29 BST 2010


Bryan,

In general, I'd say yes they'd work with OMAP4 too.

As soon as TI turns on cpufreq/cpuidle config options for OMAP4, it should
all work since the patch to allow it to work on ARM is now upstream.

However, we haven't tested since we have no OMAP4 HW.

/Amit


On 10 Sep 13, Bryan Wu wrote:
> I believe these patches will make powertop better for both x86 and
> ARM. So are they OK for omap4?
> If yes, I think we can apply them on ti-omap4 branch as well as master.
> 
> -Bryan
> 
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:31 PM,  <yong.shen at linaro.org> wrote:
> > This is for powertop to run better on kernel. the first patch is back port from 8d4b9d1bf on 2.6.36.
> > They have been tested on freescale's babage 3.0 board.
> >
> > Yong
> >
> >
> > --
> > kernel-team mailing list
> > kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
> >
> 
> -- 
> kernel-team mailing list
> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amit Kucheria, Kernel Engineer || amit.kucheria at canonical.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the linaro-dev mailing list