Hardware pack questions
james.westby at canonical.com
Mon Sep 13 16:28:41 BST 2010
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:08:19 -0400, James Westby <james.westby at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:03:16 +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at linaro.org> wrote:
> > Sure: with this change we can produce our images without any kernel
> > whatsoever (e.g. as those are coming from hwpacks).
> Ok, we're back to this again. I still haven't heard any convincing
> arguments for why that is a good idea. Could you please tell me why you
> think we should do that?
Talking to Alexander he gave some good reasons to do this eventually,
basically boiling down to it being a waste when we have hwpacks.
We agreed that we should have hwpacks that we know work ok before doing
Therefore the timeline is:
* Make hwpacks available
* Keep omap3, vexpress, etc. headless images
* Drop linux flavours from all the other images
* Make linaro-media-create etc. work well with hwpacks
* If we are happy then drop the flavours from headless too
More information about the linaro-dev