Rough notes from Kernel Consolidation meeting

Christian Robottom Reis kiko at linaro.org
Tue Sep 21 17:02:55 BST 2010


On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > 	o	Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees.  Need assignment.
> > 		Reviewed BSP review, need to send results to Loïc et al.
> 
> It would be great to see more MX51 things on ALKML (and devicetree
> things on devtree-discuss). Up to now I have the impression that there
> is still much work done behind closed doors, which is bad if we want to
> have better mainline support for i.MX5x.

That's a good point and there's nothing behind closed doors happening
that I have requested -- in fact, I mandate the opposite. I would assume
that Jeremy has been posting device tree mx51 work to the
devtree-discuss ML, and that mx51 patches coming out of the KWG and PMWG
are also posted to ALKML; correct me if I'm wrong.

It may be that it's just very little happening :-/
-- 
Christian Robottom Reis   | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | http://launchpad.net/~kiko
Linaro Engineering VP     | [ +1] 612 216 4935 | http://async.com.br/~kiko



More information about the linaro-dev mailing list