Rough notes from Kernel Consolidation meeting
robherring2 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 21 17:24:20 BST 2010
On 09/21/2010 11:02 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> o Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees. Need assignment.
>>> Reviewed BSP review, need to send results to Loïc et al.
>> It would be great to see more MX51 things on ALKML (and devicetree
>> things on devtree-discuss). Up to now I have the impression that there
>> is still much work done behind closed doors, which is bad if we want to
>> have better mainline support for i.MX5x.
> That's a good point and there's nothing behind closed doors happening
> that I have requested -- in fact, I mandate the opposite. I would assume
> that Jeremy has been posting device tree mx51 work to the
> devtree-discuss ML, and that mx51 patches coming out of the KWG and PMWG
> are also posted to ALKML; correct me if I'm wrong.
> It may be that it's just very little happening :-/
In fact, that is the case. There has been no work on it in 4 months. The
main area of work since then has been on a common struct clk to enable
DT clock support.
The MX51 DT work is here:
More information about the linaro-dev