[PATCH V4 1/5] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Wed Mar 16 05:03:55 UTC 2011
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jason Hui <jason.hui at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi, Grant,
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca> wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>> Minor comments below.
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:41PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu <jason.hui at linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu <r64343 at freescale.com>
>> This looks wrong. You should only have one s-o-b line. Use one email
>> addr or the other. Not both.
> I just take the same approach as this link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/17/363
> If you think it's not applicable, I can change it.
Yeah, I don't think that's right. A s-o-b is a personal assertion
that the patch is to the best of your knowledge that you have the
right to submit it for inclusion in the kernel (see section 12 of
Documentation/SubmittingPatches). It doesn't make any statements
about who owns the copyright on the patch or other issues of corporate
ownership. Companies may have policies about which email address
employees use when signing off, but that isn't what the s-o-b protocol
Since there isn't more than one of you, you should only have one s-o-b
Paul, since your email was presented as evidence, would you care to
offer a counter-argument? :-)
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
More information about the linaro-dev