Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?
rob at ti.com
Fri Mar 25 21:41:32 UTC 2011
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark at infradead.org> wrote:
> Rough schedules.
> 1. Warsaw meetings (3/16~3/18): mostly v4l2 person and some SoC vendors
> Make a consensence at media developers. and share the information.
> Please note that it's v4l2 brainstorming meeting. so memory
> management is not the main issue.
> 2. ELC (4/11~4/13): DRM, DRI and v4l2 person.
Fyi, I should be at ELC, at least for a day or two.. it would be nice,
as Andy suggested on other thread, to carve out a timeslot to discuss
in advance, because I'm not sure that I'll be able to be there the
> Discuss GEM/TTM is acceptable for non-X86 system and find out the
> which modules are acceptable.
> We studied the GEM for our environment. but it's too huge and not
> much benefit for us since current frameworks are enough.
> The missing is that no generic memory passing mechanism. We need the
> generic memory passing interface. that's all.
> 3. Linaro (5/9~5/13): ARM, SoC vendors and v4l2 persons.
> I hope several person are anticipated and made a small step for final goal.
More information about the linaro-dev