[ACTIVITY] Weekly status Graphics WG - wk39.2011 (20110926-20110930)

[Jesse Barker]

Those are only the session blueprints for the scheduler.  Once we've
captured all the info we need (broken each up into individual feature
blueprints that would satisfy the requirements), those will go away
(be marked "implemented").  I don't see how we get around it (well, I
suppose we could keep our planning manual and ad hoc, but I wanted to
make sure folks could use the scheduler to make sure they were able to
attend other important sessions).

cheers,
Jesse

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Christian Robottom Reis <kiko at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 12:17:11PM +0300, Ilias Biris wrote:
>>   * Benchmarking:
>> https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/public/4143/GWG2011-BENCHMARK-DASHBOARD, also
>> in Launchpad
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-graphics-misc/+spec/linaro-gfxmm-benchmark-dashboard
>>
>>   * Webkit port using CAIRO-GLES:
>> https://linaro-public.papyrs.com/public/4146/GWG2011-WEBKIT-CAIRO-GLES/#
>> also in Launchpad
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-graphics-misc/+spec/linaro-gfxmm-webkit-cairo-gles
>
> Once we have the show on the road (i.e. the roadmap items estimatded,
> approved and scheduled for Q4) would it make sense to kill the
> blueprints above? I don't like the idea of having duplication (or a
> 1-to-1 mapping) there, and ISTM that you really want to have blueprints
> that are smaller sized than what these are.
> --
> Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP
> Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935
> Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev at lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>