BUGREPORTED work item state

[James Westby]

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:55:24 +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at linaro.org> wrote:
> Do we really need this kind detail encoded in the the state of a WI itself?
> 
> Alternatively, we could always add a comment to the white board to document
> what happened
> with POSTPONED work items.

I agree with Alexander here, I think we can do without this state.

Would anyone object to me changing those workitems with that state to
POSTPONED?

Thanks,

James