cpu hotplug test scenarii

[Daniel Lezcano]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/29/2011 09:11 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/29/2011 05:41 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano
>>> <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Test 6: do some stress test
>>>> ===========================
>>>>
>>>> for each cpu
>>>>  * for i in 1 .. 50
>>>>   * set cpuX offline
>>>>   * set cpuX back online
>>>>
>>> Not sure how evil you want to get with this, but several years back I wrote
>>> a simple, but nasty test that picked a cpu at random, and set the state to
>>> the opposite of whatever it happened to be at the time.  It was completely
>>> random, I didn't have anything builtin for record/playback, or doing it in
>>> the same sequence for reproducibilty, but it didn't really need it.  When it
>>> broke things, it usually broke them within just a few minutes.
>>
>> Ok thanks for the idea, I will add what you suggest.
> 
> With cpu0 being a special case?


Yes, cpu0 will be a special case for all the tests.

- -- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOhCJqAAoJEAKBbMCpUGYAS54H/i3g9v2KcNal7zCvshmXFJcZ
xX//Np/z+1UCUowTUnV8O80XMgyOT8f0EFR8G+e6niORJk8GIlW2ZlQfIMJOYZyF
T4NEJXWYpW5G6FFORJLiAFDvC9VXrj/F2bGZa0NjhaePCmdRTdwlyv2GNJvrO6B/
/3oFpCBRGJ/3P9Pns+hy4ry/7TRkzIHw1OGv4XCbGnS8zQD7hXb1ljkpewReZVdm
srY6oLRmL9j+k7WIHMIHXyg+nv0DT8WCGrw32Rz074HJJVJwDo0xo1vEHevp76SW
BW6OtoaaiIbRYQgXM2Qbcf7BH0jxmduIfhrchTzQSHWa7K8uaqyLYTUPv9WA/JE=
=lL8N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----