cpu hotplug test scenarii
mturquette at linaro.org
Thu Sep 29 18:18:32 UTC 2011
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 09/29/2011 09:11 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Lezcano
>> <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> On 09/29/2011 05:41 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Lezcano
>>>> <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org>wrote:
>>>>> Test 6: do some stress test
>>>>> for each cpu
>>>>> * for i in 1 .. 50
>>>>> * set cpuX offline
>>>>> * set cpuX back online
>>>> Not sure how evil you want to get with this, but several years back I wrote
>>>> a simple, but nasty test that picked a cpu at random, and set the state to
>>>> the opposite of whatever it happened to be at the time. It was completely
>>>> random, I didn't have anything builtin for record/playback, or doing it in
>>>> the same sequence for reproducibilty, but it didn't really need it. When it
>>>> broke things, it usually broke them within just a few minutes.
>>> Ok thanks for the idea, I will add what you suggest.
>> With cpu0 being a special case?
> Yes, cpu0 will be a special case for all the tests.
If only we had a patch for that!
> - --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the linaro-dev