subashrp at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 12:24:36 UTC 2012
On 04/02/2012 02:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:39PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Rob Clark<rob.clark at linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds
>>> <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>> - drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but
>>>> didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for
>>>> 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their
>>>> lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I
>>>> won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please".
>>> yes, please :-)
>>> Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed
>>> by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos,
>>> omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be
>>> pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle.
>> Yes, Please.
>> It's used for exynos display and multimedia.
> There are a lot of loose pieces to juggle until we have everything in
> place for buffer sharing (and quite a few of this involve contentious
> topics). But this core piece for integrating dma-buf with drm here has
> been acked/reviewd by all the relevant people and merging it would imo
> greatly help in wiring up all the other loose ends.
> Cheers, Daniel
(yes, please) ++
I have been using the dma-buf with dma-mapping(Marek's patches) on
origen(exynos4210), and basic things are good. I wish this gets into
kernel along with the dma-mapping support asap.
More information about the linaro-dev