[PATCH v7 3/3] clk: basic clock hardware types

Turquette, Mike mturquette at ti.com
Fri Mar 16 16:51:19 UTC 2012


On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao at linaro.org> wrote:
> [...]
>> +static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> +             unsigned long *best_parent_rate)
>> +{
>> +     struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw);
>> +     int i, bestdiv = 0;
>> +     unsigned long parent_rate, best = 0, now, maxdiv;
>> +
>> +     if (!rate)
>> +             rate = 1;
>> +
>> +     maxdiv = (1 << divider->width);
>> +
>> +     if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)
>> +             maxdiv--;
>> +
>> +     if (!best_parent_rate) {
>> +             parent_rate = __clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk));
>> +             bestdiv = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate);
>> +             bestdiv = bestdiv == 0 ? 1 : bestdiv;
>> +             bestdiv = bestdiv > maxdiv ? maxdiv : bestdiv;
>> +             return bestdiv;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     /*
>> +      * The maximum divider we can use without overflowing
>> +      * unsigned long in rate * i below
>> +      */
>> +     maxdiv = min(ULONG_MAX / rate, maxdiv);
>> +
>> +     for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i++) {
>> +             parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk),
>> +                             MULT_ROUND_UP(rate, i));
>> +             now = parent_rate / i;
>> +             if (now <= rate && now > best) {
>> +                     bestdiv = i;
>> +                     best = now;
>> +                     *best_parent_rate = parent_rate;
> Better add              if (now == rate)
>                                break;
> There may be more than one hit for (now == rate). We'd better select
> smallest div, thus smallest parent_rate.

Hmm I forgot to take this in.  Notice that the conditional above has changed:

if (now <= rate && now > best) {

So the smallest divider _will_ be selected, but adding in your check
for now == rate is nice since it will prevent unnecessary looping if
we've managed to hit the exact rate that we want.  I'll ninja this one
into the merge request.

Thanks,
Mike

>
> It's the same comment for v6, but not show stopper.
>
> Thanks
> Richard
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     if (!bestdiv) {
>> +             bestdiv = (1 << divider->width);
>> +             if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)
>> +                     bestdiv--;
>> +             *best_parent_rate = __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk), 1);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return bestdiv;
>> +}
>



More information about the linaro-dev mailing list