[RFC][PATCH 0/7] OMAP4 cpuidle cleanup
daniel.lezcano at linaro.org
Wed Mar 21 09:51:33 UTC 2012
On 03/21/2012 10:36 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
>> The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
>> driver itself.
> Thanks. Will have a look at your series.
>> A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only
> Because the mainline code CPUIDLE is supported along with CPUhotplug.
> This is going to change though with Couple CPUIDLE and corresponding
> OMAP updates.
Ok, thanks for the information. I will look deeper. What happens to cpu1
when it is online and has nothing to do ?
>> and why the WFI is not used ?
> I didn't get this question. Do you mean the generic WFI?
> If yes, then, it's mainly because OMAP need additional
> custom barriers.
Ah, ok. I am not sure if it is possible but that may be cool if we can
call cpu_do_idle instead with additional barrier.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
More information about the linaro-dev