[PATCH] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock
oleg at redhat.com
Thu Feb 2 12:54:41 UTC 2012
On 02/01, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> @@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ static int lowmem_shrink(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
> selected_oom_adj = min_adj;
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + rcu_read_lock();
This has the same problem, force_sig() becomes unsafe.
Why do you need force_? Do you really want to kill /sbin/init (or sub-namespace
We could change force_sig_info() to use lock_task_sighand(), but I'd like to
avoid this. Imho, this interface should be cleanuped, and it should be used
for synchronous signals only.
With or without this patch, sig == NULL is not possible but !mm is not right,
there could be other other threads with mm != NULL.
More information about the linaro-kernel