[PATCH 2/6] ramoops: Move to fs/pstore/ram.c
anton.vorontsov at linaro.org
Wed May 16 13:57:49 UTC 2012
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:17:51AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
> > @@ -585,15 +585,6 @@ config DEVPORT
> > source "drivers/s390/char/Kconfig"
> > -config RAMOOPS
> > - tristate "Log panic/oops to a RAM buffer"
> > - depends on HAS_IOMEM
> > - depends on PSTORE
> This "depends on PSTORE" line is not in my staging-next tree, where did
> it come from?
The thing is that ramoops switched to pstore just recently, and the
patch is in -mm tree.
(Just for the record, I use linux-next-20120504, HEAD at commit
> I'm guessing that because of this, is why the other conflict happens,
> Any ideas on what I can do to resolve it? As you are moving a file, I
> want to make sure I move the correct version of it :)
There's a cross-tree dependency with -mm tree, as it appears.
So, I'm not sure which is better:
1. Push the whole pile of patches via -mm; or
2. You apply the two patches from -mm tree before my series:
"ramoops: use pstore interface"
linux-next commit 60aad9fc1f04ca19e800c5984ad84f405d133a11
"ramoops: fix printk format warnings"
linux-next commit f2a28afdb529c43a7eb21fd0c991cab5676ef011
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/ seem to not respond at the
moment, so I guess the easiest way to grab the patches would
be to cherry-pick the two commits above from the linux-next
repository. That way Andrew would automatically drop them
from his tree.
Email: cbouatmailru at gmail.com
More information about the linaro-kernel