STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_ARM_IRELATIVE

[Richard Sandiford]

Loïc Minier <loic.minier at linaro.org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>    2. Go ahead and implement it without having the EABI updated.
>>       See whether the results are good before deciding whether
>>       to bless it in the EABI.
>
>  My understanding is that we need to have an implementation to be in a
>  position to request inclusion; it's a bit chicken and egg, so we could
>  just inform them that we're starting a prototype with this and that
>  number and then circle back when it's done?

Yeah, makes sense.  I'll prototype it using one of the private relocs,
but make sure that nothing gets committed into stable sources with
that number.

Richard