the linaro toolchain and older arm versions

[Loïc Minier]

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> OOI, what are the U-Boot targets you're looking to build for that don't
> support ARMv7?  A gcc multilib package for armel will be easy to implement
> but hard to maintain, and certainly none of the systems Linaro is targeting
> should require a pre-Thumb-2 U-Boot, so I'm very doubtful that the ongoing
> effort to maintain such a toolchain in Ubuntu is justified (unless we find
> that it becomes substantially easier with multiarch, I guess, but we're a
> ways away from that yet).

 Isn't Thumb 2 the actual issue here?  U-Boot is built with -marm; does
 it cause any issue to mix with our Thumb-2 libgcc?

-- 
Loïc Minier