2010.09 build results
ams at codesourcery.com
Mon Sep 13 09:55:45 BST 2010
On 13/09/10 00:46, Michael Hope wrote:
> Your thoughts?
The only real regressions are the vectorizer tests, and I'm not worried
about those because a) They're only missed optimizations, not
correctness issues, and b) I know there are also a number of
progressions in the vectorizer tests, so what we lose in one place, we
win somewhere else. We should find out if the tests are bogus, or there
is a real problem - in an ideal world all the tests would pass.
I tested glibc and there were no regressions, so I think we can make the
More information about the linaro-toolchain