2010.09 build results

[Andrew Stubbs]

On 13/09/10 00:46, Michael Hope wrote:
> Your thoughts?

The only real regressions are the vectorizer tests, and I'm not worried 
about those because a) They're only missed optimizations, not 
correctness issues, and b) I know there are also a number of 
progressions in the vectorizer tests, so what we lose in one place, we 
win somewhere else. We should find out if the tests are bogus, or there 
is a real problem - in an ideal world all the tests would pass.

I tested glibc and there were no regressions, so I think we can make the 
releases safely.

Andrew