NEON vectorization improvements - preliminary notes

Andrew Stubbs ams at codesourcery.com
Wed Sep 22 17:03:18 BST 2010


On 22/09/10 12:23, Ira Rosen wrote:
>> The goal is a 15% speed improvement in EEMBC relative to FSF GCC 4.5.0
> Does this mean to improve a single benchmark from EEMBC by 15%?
> Do you have an EEMBC? I have a very old version, without DENBench, which
> looks interesting according to EEMBC's site. Other than that TeleBench and
> Consumer might have vectorization potential.

I don't think this is well defined, so, I guess that means we get to 
twist it any way we like. ;)

Seriously though, I would argue that it should be 15% on average, across 
all the EEMBC tests, or at least across all the tests where 
vectorization makes sense.

The exact "15%" figure is not based on any hard facts, so we don't need 
to get too precise about it.

Andrew



More information about the linaro-toolchain mailing list