Armhf dynamic linker path
vapier at gentoo.org
Mon Apr 2 19:04:11 UTC 2012
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 09:19, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 31 March 2012 19:52, Dennis Gilmore <dennis at gilmore.net.au> wrote:
>> Linaro Connect and other events are probably the worst place for such
>> decisions and discussions to be made. though maybe there is not a good
>> place. the wider community needs to be engaged for greatest acceptance.
>> otherwise then if falls into the vacuum of those attending the events.
>> Like I said its not that it could never happen just that its not been
>> discussed at all. so requesting that distros adopt it is a bit harsh
>> and unrealistic.
> At Linaro conference the need for changing linker path was agreed on,
> as well as the need to get a wide community agreement on it. To do the
> latter, an ARM minisummit was organized on at Plumbers 2011 .
> Invites to wide range communities and distributions were sent, and for
> most someone attended. For the people not able to join physically, a
> call-in line was organized (I was on the call for example). With the
> expectation that people who attended in face or on call would convey
> the message back to their own communities. This didn't seemingly
> happen for everyone it seems.
i agree that the ldso needs changing to something unique so everyone
can start off on the same page with a sane path. i don't think
forcing everyone into the multi-arch stuff that debian is deploying
makes sense though. this seems like a fairly behind-the-back maneuver
in terms of slipping it into mainline.
More information about the linaro-toolchain