Spec 2000 broken?

Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro.org
Tue Feb 28 20:22:40 UTC 2012


On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Michael Hope <michael.hope at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Stubbs <andrew.stubbs at linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> I ran the benchmark tests on GCC 4.7, but the spec2000 run seems to have
>> failed. This is both on the baseline, and on my patch.
>>
>> See here:
>> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/benchmarks/gcc-linaro-4.7%2bbzr114968~ams-codesourcery~arm-64-bit-shifts-4.7/logs/armv7l-natty-cbuild254-tcpanda06-cortexa9r1/
>
> I noticed similar yesterday.  SPEC 'relocate' uses the build directory
> in a regex which fails when it hits the '+' and other random
> characters we use in the path name.  Once past that, it hits the 80
> character interpreter path limit and dies.
>
> I've fixed both.  Please resubmit any SPEC jobs.

I've spawned spec2000 runs of
gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114968~ams-codesourcery~arm-64-bit-shifts-4.7 and
the ancestor gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr114965.

-- Michael



More information about the linaro-toolchain mailing list