[Linaro-validation] Hey

[Alexander Sack]

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Paul Larson <paul.larson at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Benjamin Gaignard
>>
>> last time I have ask the cable was on panda 03 :-)
>> Anyway e2eaudiotest itself isn't mature enough, I believe that we still
>> have issue on audio paths settings, but Kurt will work on that (Tom can you
>> confirm ?)
>>
>> I have submit lava e2e test to check if the parser was working well even
>> on error cases.
>
> That could be, we need to add tags to the boards that have it so that you
> can be sure, but for the audio cables, they are cheap enough that we should
> really just put them everywhere.  And yes, even if the the test fails

Yes! I have said that a few times: add it and use lava to track the
fixing of audio and the test itself. It's a nature that if a test
fails it can be that the feature it tests is broken or the test itself
needs to be adjusted.

-- 
Alexander Sack
Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams
http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog