[Linaro-validation] UI driven test framework for Android

Le.chi Thu le.chi.thu at linaro.org
Wed Mar 28 12:05:31 UTC 2012


I will talk with you about the tema.

BR

/Chi Thu

On 27 March 2012 22:07, Paul Larson <paul.larson at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Zach, I think the main thing we were looking for feedback from you on is
> this tema test, and whether you consider it to be useful beyond what
> monkeyrunner already provides.  There seems to be some overlap.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfeffer at linaro.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 23 March 2012 08:07, Le.chi Thu <le.chi.thu at linaro.org> wrote:
>> > sorry not include the link to blueprints.
>> >
>> > Here they are :
>> >
>> >
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-scheduler/+spec/manually-health-check
>> >
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/linaro-validation-ste-kernel-testsuite
>> >
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-scheduler/+spec/health-check-job-vexpress
>> >
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/ui-drive-test-for-android
>>
>> Whatever lands in the Android build should land across all targets at
>> the platform level. The tests should also be integrated into the build
>> so that people can run them manually.
>>
>> I think the first 3 BPs should be joined by other BPs that track
>> health checks on the remaining targets.
>>
>> It looks like
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/ui-drive-test-for-android
>> can be integrated into the build. We can put together a new git for
>> it. Does:
>>
>> git://android.git.linaro.org/test/linaro/android/tema.git
>>
>> sound good?
>>
>>
>> > BR
>> >
>> > /Chi Thu
>> >
>> > On 23 March 2012 11:56, Fathi Boudra <fathi.boudra at linaro.org> wrote:
>> >> On 23 March 2012 12:51, Alexander Sack <asac at linaro.org> wrote:
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:22:00PM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Le.chi Thu <le.chi.thu at linaro.org>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > Here is the blueprints I would like to work with in next cycle and
>> >>>> > the
>> >>>> > highest first
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > * health-check-job-vexpress (very small task)
>> >>>> > * Include STE kernel test suite in LAVA and CI
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> The above two are good ones, I know the STE kernel suite has some
>> >>>> issues to
>> >>>> sort out wrt building though.
>> >>>
>> >>> Do we already have a blueprint with details about inclusion of the STE
>> >>> test suite in the backlog? in particular what is this "building"
>> >>> problem about...
>> >>
>> >> Here's the blueprint:
>> >>
>> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/lava-test/+spec/linaro-validation-ste-kernel-testsuite
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zach Pfeffer
>> Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
>> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
>> Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
>> http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
>
>



More information about the linaro-validation mailing list