dave.pigott at linaro.org
Tue May 8 07:08:22 UTC 2012
+1 - Very good idea. Can have a more focussed set of discussions this way.
On 7 May 2012, at 20:21, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> Hi folks.
> I'd like to propose that we keep all the lava discussion in
> #linaro-lava if possible, this will allow participants, who are not
> working for linaro, to join and quickly identify people that share the
> interest in our common framework. The channel name is a compromise
> between unavailable #lava (already owned by unrelated project) and
> staying in #linaro (that sees a fair amount of unrelated traffic). I
> also considered #linaro-validation but I think we have agreed in the
> past that we want to transition away from the "validation" keyword to
> This is not formally done yet, I'd like to have a chanserv registry (I
> think all #linaro-* channels are automatically managed though) and
> public logs, much like we have on #linaro today.
> So, if you support this idea and find yourself talking or observing a
> discussion about LAVA in #linaro please gently suggest the
> participants to move to #linaro-lava
> Zygmunt Krynicki
> linaro-validation mailing list
> linaro-validation at lists.linaro.org
More information about the linaro-validation