On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 6:25 PM Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk@gmx.de wrote:
On 6/5/19 3:55 PM, Francois Ozog wrote:
II - Desired DT for EBBR policy
- "upstream" DT
1.1) who provides DT Board vendor make a <reference DT> that describes every hardware piece, firmware provides a DT to OS, OS may be able to validate the DT but not override it in secureboot production. For security and boot latency consideration, firmware may actually need two DTs: a stripped version from <reference DT> to operate on the minimal set of devices it want to bring up the OS (say the <firmware DT>), a pruned/adapted version from <reference DT> , ie without devices firmware wants to control and conforms to EBBR spec (say the <OS DT>).
Can we get the Linux Foundation involved to integrate their view?
Who from the Linux Foundation are you thinking about? The LF-proper doesn't really operate at this level. Some of the groups might, like LF Edge.
g.