Greetings,

I have send the patches as you requested(RFC), and also ran the checkpath.pl.

Every patch passed except a single WARNING, i added a new file (coresight-etm-api.c),

and it seems that i needed to update the MAINTAINERS file, but in this case specifically

there is no need to because the entire coresight directory is mentioned with a wildcard:

drivers/hwtracing/coresight/*

Thanks,

Mike.

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote:

Hi Mike,

On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 05:51, Mike Bazov <mike@perception-point.io> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have attached 4 patches that implement the API i needed. I haven't send it officially as a patch
> to the mailing list, since this is a POC and merely a request for review and "approval" of the approach
> i have taken here. The patches are rebased on the latest TIP of coresight tree "next" branch(correct to the
> time of sending this message).

Thanks for working on this. Please resend using a cover-letter, "git
send-email" and a clean run through checkpatch.pl. I would simply use
the "RFC" tag instead of "PATCH" when submitting proof of concepts
like that.

Mathieu