On domenica 19 marzo 2023 16:29:09 CET Menna Mahmoud wrote:

> Remove unnecessary blank line before struct as reported

> by checkpatch:

>

> " CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines "

>

> Signed-off-by: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com>

> ---

>  drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 1 -

>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

>

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c

> index 3fda172239d2..26d39e08c3b6 100644

> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c

> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c

> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ struct gb_pwm_chip {

>  #define pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip) \

>      container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip)

>

> -

>  static int gb_pwm_count_operation(struct gb_pwm_chip *pwmc)

>  {

>      struct gb_pwm_count_response response;

> --

> 2.34.1

Hi Menna,

I just saw that today you sent this patch at least three times:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319114155.42148-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319152909.163598-1-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com/

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319132452.151877-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@gmail.com/

Why are you doing so?

Please send your patches only once and wait at least a week without any replies before resending. Furthermore, when resending, please explain under the three dashes ("---") why you are doing so. Patches may get lost, but this is not your case for sending them again and again in a single day.

Is there anything I'm missing?

Thanks,

Fabio