On Monday, July 20, 2015 03:22:09 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 09/07/15 19:04, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
This driver utilizes the methods introduced in the previous patch - "ACPI: Introduce CPU performance controls using CPPC" and enables usage with existing CPUFreq governors.
Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Al Stone al.stone@linaro.org
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 16 ++++ drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 2 + drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 215 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm index 4f3dbc8..578384d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm @@ -272,3 +272,19 @@ config ARM_PXA2xx_CPUFREQ This add the CPUFreq driver support for Intel PXA2xx SOCs.
If in doubt, say N.
+config ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ
- tristate "CPUFreq driver based on the ACPI CPPC spec"
- depends on ACPI_CPPC_LIB
- default n
- help
This adds a CPUFreq driver which uses CPPC methods
as described in the ACPIv5.1 spec. CPPC stands for
Collaborative Processor Performance Controls. It
is based on an abstract continuous scale of CPU
performance values which allows the remote power
processor to flexibly optimize for power and
performance. CPPC relies on power management firmware
for its operation.
Why is this ARM specific ? It might be used only on ARM but doesn't mean it should be visible only on ARM ACPI systems.
Why bother people with considering Kconfig options that are useless to them?
Thanks, Rafael