On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 03:03:23PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/04/2014 14:23, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
Are they inter-dependent? I thought your patches depended on Anup's - not the other way around?
If my assumption is correct, I think we can make sure to send the pull request to kvm/next early and ask Catalin to pull in kvm/next before pulling your changes.
I'm cc'ing both Catalin and Paolo here for their advice.
Is Anup's patchset already on a branch? If you send me a pointer to it I can look at that branch history and see what's best.
I didn't merge it yet - need to make one final pass over it (likely later tonight).
But this is the series: https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2014-April/009061.html
I believe Ashwin's patch set depends only on "ARM/ARM64: KVM: Add common header for PSCI related defines".
Thanks, -Christoffer