Al

I am not sure about this.

What if one day we have ARM vendors showing up with x86-like fake registers just to be fully fixed hw profile compliant and feeling they could be safer than with the resuced hw profile, for whichever reason?

I would suggest we have two flags, which would be both set in 99.9% of ARM platforms but maybe there could be a 0.1% where it is ARM and fixed profile one day?

Thanks
Andrea

On Wednesday, November 13, 2013, wrote:
From: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>

Modify the kernel configuration so that if ARM is selected, then
ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE is also selected.

Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 099ca81..23522b4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 config ACPI_ARM
        bool
        select EARLY_IOREMAP
+       select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE

 menuconfig ACPI
        bool "ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support"
--
1.8.3.1


_______________________________________________
Linaro-acpi mailing list
Linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-acpi


--
Andrea Gallo
Director, Linaro Enterprise Group
email: andrea.gallo@linaro.org
mobile: +39 338 4075993
IRC: agallo@#linaro on irc.linaro.org
Skype: agallo70