On 13 March 2013 06:35, Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bernhard.rosenkranzer@linaro.org> wrote:

On 12 March 2013 21:42, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfeffer@linaro.org> wrote:

On 12 March 2013 15:26, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> This is something external folks are reporting. Should we make sure the
> default manifest is already rewritten?

We discussed that, but err'd on the side of leaving it as is so that
repo upload would work. The choice is up to Bero now.

I'll need some input on this -- is anyone actually working on this tree with repo upload?

Personally, I just use git directly anyway, so I wouldn't even notice if we broke it - but obviously I don't want to break other people's workflow.

So... Does anyone use repo upload?

We have already switch to http in all the manifests in the main manifest repository. repo upload feature still works since we don't change the "review" URL. I think the juice manifest repositories were not updated.

ttyl
bero