On 31 January 2012 12:02, Alexander Sack
<asac@linaro.org> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mansson <
tony.mansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The full names are kind of cumbersome to use in everyday speech so I predict
> nicknames :)
see what happens?
I suggest we call the snowball build Yeti since that was my suggestion for the name of the board, but the jury selected snowball. :)
I think most of us will ignore ics, and gcc in the name and just call it the upstream- or stable-snowball and so on.
And +1 on Jons comment about the order.
Do we really need all pf the builds? I think not only the names, but the number of builds have caused some confusion. Didn't we have an idea that we would try to reduce the number of manifests?
/Patrik
--
Alexander Sack
Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams
http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs