On 24 January 2012 11:39, anmar.oueja@linaro.org <anmar.oueja@linaro.org> wrote:
Hello Zach:

On 24 January 2012 11:05, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfeffer@linaro.org> wrote:
> Since we're all in on our igloo/Linaro co-developed method we'd like to stop
> working on staging-snowball (Linaro kernel) and focus our efforts on
> landing-snowball (igloo kernel). Does anyone have any objections?

From my perspective, that is a great idea. However, I would like us to
pick less cryptic names. People can't easily associate the
Landing-snowball build with the igloo kernel.  Can we adopt a simpler
naming scheme such as official and community.  I know we need to make
this change across other landing teams as well but it is worth the
pain.

Anmar,

You are right. We do need to fix the names. How would a tuple work:

<kernel src>-<gcc version>-<AOSP version>-<target>

So staging-snowball would be:

linaro-gcc4.6-aosp4.0.3-snowball

and landing-snowball would be

igloo-gcc4.6-aosp4.0.3-snowball

What do you think?


 

anmar



--
Zach Pfeffer
Android Platform Team Lead, Linaro Platform Teams
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog