On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Zach Pfeffer <zach.pfeffer@linaro.org> wrote:
On 8 May 2012 18:57, Paul Larson <paul.larson@linaro.org> wrote:
> That's one possibility, but is 3 enough? We could get into a game where 3,
> 10, 100 is never enough to catch the problem.  The other obvious thing that
> jumps out at me here is that reboot and shutdown are tested on the ubuntu
> side, but not on android.  If we covered both of those, we would already
> have multiple boots covered.  I would be ok with 3 boots as a reasonable
> number, but I think it would be even better if we added it implicitly by
> adding reboot and halt as tests.

Its a start for a manual test. I think the 100 reboots that Alexander
mentions in LAVA is also good. If you;re plus one would you add it to
the Android test wiki?
Adding what, the 3 boots instead of single boot, or the boot + reboot + halt and boot as I described (which would still be 3  boots, but would also cover additional cases that are currently not covered).