Hi Yingshiuan,
Did you get the test result of 32bit android? Thanks.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
aarch64, CA57*2 + CA53*4
well, I think I should rerun the benchmarks with 32-bit android
--
潘穎軒 Yingshiuan (Peter) Pan
2015-07-07 11:33 GMT+08:00 yfw <fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>:<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org <mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>>:
Hi Yingshiuan,
What kind of cpu arch is Juno? Here is the info shared from Spreadtrum
about their core:
Cortex-A7 with NEON.
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 5 (v7l)
processor : 0
model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 5 (v7l)
BogoMIPS : 1548.16
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3 tls
vfpv4 idiva idivt vfpd32
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x0
CPU part : 0xc07
CPU revision : 5
... ...
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
On 2015年07月07日 11:11, Yingshiuan Pan wrote:
Hi Fengwei,
I did not see such big performance regression on Juno,
followings are my
result:
geekbench 3.3.2:
single multi
w/o opt. memcpy 857 2221
with opt. memcpy 855 2263
performance gain -0.2% 1.9%
Quadrant 2.1
w/o opt. memcpy 9662
with opt. memcpy 9563
performance gain -1.0%
--
潘穎軒 Yingshiuan (Peter) Pan
2015-07-06 11:16 GMT+08:00 yfw <fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
Hi Yingshiuan,
That's fine. Do we have updated patch for memcpy? Did you
get the
Quadrant/Geekbench3 data in your side? Thanks.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
On 2015年07月06日 09:24, Yingshiuan Pan wrote:
Hi Fengwei
Sorry, my carelessness, you're right.
--
潘穎軒 Yingshiuan (Peter) Pan
2015-07-03 19:51 GMT+08:00 yfw <fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>><mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>>><mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>>>:
Hi Yingshiuan,
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/147915/ is for memchr.
while
http://review.android.git.linaro.org/#/c/15529/ is for memcpy.
Could you
please double check whether you have correct link?
Thanks.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
在 2015/7/3 14:04, Yingshiuan Pan 写道:
Hi Fengwei,
Thanks for the report, there is a new revision
here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/147915/
Although only single instruction is changed,
someone
said he did see
measurable improvement.
Would you give a try? I'll also run those
benchmarks to
see if I can
reproduce the result.
btw, what is the platform you are using?
--
潘穎軒 Yingshiuan (Peter) Pan
2015-07-03 13:59 GMT+08:00 yfw
<fengwei.yin@linaro.org <mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>> <mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>>>>:
From their report, they used:
Quadrant Professional(v2.1.1)
GeekBench3 (v3.3.2)
I suppose the methodology to run these
benchmarks
is very
known.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
在 2015/7/3 11:53, Tom Gall 写道:
Hi Fengwei,
Thanks for the report. I think we
would be
interested in
knowing the
nature of the test being used.
I've added Bero to the CC as I'm sure
he'll be
interested as well.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:35 PM, yfw
<fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org
<mailto:fengwei.yin@linaro.org>>>>> wrote:
Hi,
About the patch
http://review.android.git.linaro.org/#/c/15529/, we got
an issue report from member. It could
improve the micro
benchmark but
hurt general benchmark actually.
Here is
their test
result:
bionic-benchmarks32
BM_string_memcpy:
Size AOSP Linaro Perf
Improvement
8 450.7 329.5 -37%
64 1715.7 2225.3 23%
512 3100.7 4253.0 27%
1K 3271.8 4652.3 30%
8K 2460.9 3174.7 22%
16K 2267.4 2953.2 23%
32K 2222.9 2800.7 21%
64K 2204.3 2640.1 17%
without
patch with
patch
perf delta
Quadrant mem 3400
2100 -38%
GeekBench3
single-core 436
260
-40%
multi-core 434
358
-18%
I am wondering whether this is an
known
issue or
not for
this list.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
_______________________________________________
linaro-android mailing list
linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>>>
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
_______________________________________________
linaro-android mailing list
linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org>
<mailto:linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android