Hi Per,
On Thu, May 05 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
From: Stefan Nilsson XK stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com
If there is only 1 function interrupt registered it is possible to improve performance by directly calling the irq handler and avoiding the overhead of reading the CCCR registers.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin per.forlin@linaro.org Acked-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@stericsson.com Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c index b300161..03ead02 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c @@ -31,6 +31,17 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card) { int i, ret, count; unsigned char pending;
- struct sdio_func *func;
- /*
* Optimization, if there is only 1 function interrupt registered* call irq handler directly*/- func = card->sdio_single_irq;
- if (func) {
func->irq_handler(func);return 1;- }
ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_INTx, 0, &pending); if (ret) { @@ -42,7 +53,7 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card) count = 0; for (i = 1; i <= 7; i++) { if (pending & (1 << i)) {
struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_func[i - 1];
func = card->sdio_func[i - 1]; if (!func) { printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: pending IRQ for " "non-existent function\n",@@ -186,6 +197,24 @@ static int sdio_card_irq_put(struct mmc_card *card) return 0; } +/* If there is only 1 function registered set sdio_single_irq */ +static void sdio_single_irq_set(struct mmc_card *card) +{
- struct sdio_func *func;
- int i;
- card->sdio_single_irq = NULL;
- if ((card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ) &&
card->host->sdio_irqs == 1)for (i = 0; i < card->sdio_funcs; i++) {func = card->sdio_func[i];if (func && func->irq_handler) {card->sdio_single_irq = func;break;}}+}
/**
- sdio_claim_irq - claim the IRQ for a SDIO function
- @func: SDIO function
@@ -227,6 +256,7 @@ int sdio_claim_irq(struct sdio_func *func, sdio_irq_handler_t *handler) ret = sdio_card_irq_get(func->card); if (ret) func->irq_handler = NULL;
- sdio_single_irq_set(func->card);
return ret; } @@ -251,6 +281,7 @@ int sdio_release_irq(struct sdio_func *func) if (func->irq_handler) { func->irq_handler = NULL; sdio_card_irq_put(func->card);
sdio_single_irq_set(func->card);ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(func->card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_IENx, 0, ®); diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h index adb4888..0d64211 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ struct mmc_card { struct sdio_cccr cccr; /* common card info */ struct sdio_cis cis; /* common tuple info */ struct sdio_func *sdio_func[SDIO_MAX_FUNCS]; /* SDIO functions (devices) */
- struct sdio_func *sdio_single_irq; /* SDIO function when only one IRQ active */ unsigned num_info; /* number of info strings */ const char **info; /* info strings */ struct sdio_func_tuple *tuples; /* unknown common tuples */
This patch doesn't apply cleanly -- please re-send against mmc-next.
Thanks,
- Chris.