Le 25 janv. 2013 13:00, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> 2013/1/25 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>:
> > This sequence is not the right one
> >
> >> I'm going to look for the saved trace to check the sequence above
> >
> > I haven't been able to reproduce the bug that this patch was supposed to
> > solved. The patch 2 and 3 seem enough to fix the nr_busy_cpus field. I will
> > continue to try to reproduce it but it seems that it was a side effect of
> > the 2 others fixes of the series
>
> Ok. I just checked again as well and I can't find a scenario where
> this can happen. If you find it out or trigger the bug again, don't
> hesitate to resend this patch.

Ok. I'm going to update the patch serie without this patch

Thanks
>
> Thanks.