Unfortunately, not as easy as it sounds. We'd have to actually change the dispatcher to intercept submissions to vexpress, and then re-route them to vexpress-a9, because we can'\t have two device instances talking to the same device. I'll look into it, but it would be quite a nasty bodge.

Dave

On 24 Sep 2012, at 10:23, Alexander Sack wrote:

could we keep deprecated backward compatibility mapping on LAVA side for a while?

On Sep 24, 2012 10:01 AM, "Paul Sokolovsky" <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org> wrote:
Hello,

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:30:34 +0100
Dave Pigott <dave.pigott@linaro.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I notice that there are still some jobs being submitted to LAVA with
> the device-type "vexpress". This device type is now deprecated and
> has been replaced by the more specific device type vexpress-a9. The
> jobs seem to be coming from CI and Android. Could someone amend these
> submissions?

Tracked as https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-ci/+bug/1055354 (Critical).

>
> Thanks
>
> Dave


--
Best Regards,
Paul

Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation