We only have things in the PPA right now, so SRUs aren&#39;t needed anyway.  Are you talking about continuing packages for everything, or just for the client side tools?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Alexander Sack <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:asac@linaro.org">asac@linaro.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Paul Larson <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:paul.larson@linaro.org" target="_blank">paul.larson@linaro.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

</div><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This mostly affects the server side components, yes.  I&#39;m open to the idea of continuing packages for the client-side tools, if it would be useful to others.<br><br></blockquote></div><div>At best we would continue packaging for the ubuntu development releases, but not need to do SRUs regularly to keep them working with new servers... you think that&#39;s possible to maintain at this point? <br>

<font color="#888888">
<br>-- <br></font></div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">Alexander Sack<br>Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams<br><a href="http://www.linaro.org" target="_blank">http://www.linaro.org</a> | Open source software for ARM SoCs<br>


<a href="http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg</a> - <a href="http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog" target="_blank">http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog</a><br><br><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>