On 5 August 2013 10:44, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@linaro.org> wrote:

On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote:

> The whole list is good things to have I just wonder how ongoing

> updates will be handled for backport. For example at some point
> "Tweaks to the MCPM code which aren't upstream." will go upstream and
> probably be a bit different by then, someone should "revert" (it may
> not be that clean since other patches may have meddled) the old one in
> lsk and "replace" with the upstream patches. Mark's watching out for
> that, or you are for the trees you merged that went into LSK, or
> what's the plan?

Plan? There's no plan that I know of.

As was mentioned on linaro-kernel the plan is that you should be sending me incremental updates as needed. I'm not monitoring everything that goes upstream, especially in this case where I didn't get a breakdown of what went in there or topic branches for the vexpress enablement so I've very little visibility of what's there.