Hi Sascha,

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:36:12AM +0100, yong.shen@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Yong Shen <yong.shen@freescale.com>
>
> implement cpuidle driver for iMX5 SOCs, leave cpuidle params to board
> related code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Shen <yong.shen@freescale.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile  |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.c |  113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.h |   26 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> index 0d43be9..12239e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-y   := cpu.o mm.o clock-mx51-mx53.o devices.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX50) += mm-mx50.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_IMX)    += cpu_op-mx51.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)       += cpuidle.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX51_BABBAGE) += board-mx51_babbage.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX51_3DS) += board-mx51_3ds.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX53_EVK) += board-mx53_evk.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9d77c47
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.c
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> +#include <mach/hardware.h>
> +#include "cpuidle.h"
> +#include "crm_regs.h"
> +
> +static struct imx_cpuidle_params *imx_cpuidle_params;
> +void imx_cpuidle_board_params(struct imx_cpuidle_params *cpuidle_params)
> +{
> +     imx_cpuidle_params = cpuidle_params;
> +}
> +
> +extern int tzic_enable_wake(int is_idle);

Please put this into a header file.
Ok, but I guess I should do it in another patch before this patch set. 

> +static int imx_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> +                            struct cpuidle_state *state)
> +{
> +     struct timeval before, after;
> +     int idle_time;
> +     u32 plat_lpc, arm_srpgcr, ccm_clpcr;
> +     u32 empgc0, empgc1;
> +
> +     local_irq_disable();
> +     do_gettimeofday(&before);
> +
> +     plat_lpc = __raw_readl(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC) &
> +         ~(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC_DSM);
> +     ccm_clpcr = __raw_readl(MXC_CCM_CLPCR) & ~(MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_MASK);
> +     arm_srpgcr = __raw_readl(MXC_SRPG_ARM_SRPGCR) & ~(MXC_SRPGCR_PCR);
> +     empgc0 = __raw_readl(MXC_SRPG_EMPGC0_SRPGCR) & ~(MXC_SRPGCR_PCR);
> +     empgc1 = __raw_readl(MXC_SRPG_EMPGC1_SRPGCR) & ~(MXC_SRPGCR_PCR);
> +
> +     if (state == &dev->states[WAIT_CLK_ON])
> +             ;

An if without code? This looks strange.
Yes, a little bit. I meant to treat this like a explanation for different cases, and I also can remove it and put a comments here.

> +     else if (state == &dev->states[WAIT_CLK_OFF])
> +             ccm_clpcr |= (0x1 << MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_OFFSET);
> +     else if (state == &dev->states[WAIT_CLK_OFF_POWER_OFF]) {
> +             /* Wait unclocked, power off */
> +             plat_lpc |= MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC_DSM
> +                         | MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC_DBG_DSM;
> +             arm_srpgcr |= MXC_SRPGCR_PCR;
> +             ccm_clpcr |= (0x1 << MXC_CCM_CLPCR_LPM_OFFSET);
> +             ccm_clpcr &= ~MXC_CCM_CLPCR_VSTBY;
> +             ccm_clpcr &= ~MXC_CCM_CLPCR_SBYOS;
> +             if (tzic_enable_wake(1) != 0) {
> +                     local_irq_enable();
> +                     return 0;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     __raw_writel(plat_lpc, MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC);
> +     __raw_writel(ccm_clpcr, MXC_CCM_CLPCR);
> +     __raw_writel(arm_srpgcr, MXC_SRPG_ARM_SRPGCR);
> +
> +     cpu_do_idle();
> +
> +     do_gettimeofday(&after);
> +     local_irq_enable();
> +     idle_time = (after.tv_sec - before.tv_sec) * USEC_PER_SEC +
> +                     (after.tv_usec - before.tv_usec);
> +     return idle_time;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cpuidle_driver imx_cpuidle_driver = {
> +     .name =         "imx_idle",
> +     .owner =        THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_device, imx_cpuidle_device);
> +
> +static int __init imx_cpuidle_init(void)
> +{
> +     struct cpuidle_device *device;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     if (imx_cpuidle_params == NULL)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     cpuidle_register_driver(&imx_cpuidle_driver);
> +
> +     device = &per_cpu(imx_cpuidle_device, smp_processor_id());
> +     device->state_count = IMX_MAX_CPUIDLE_STATE;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < IMX_MAX_CPUIDLE_STATE && i < CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX; i++) {
> +             device->states[i].enter = imx_enter_idle;
> +             device->states[i].exit_latency = imx_cpuidle_params[i].latency;
> +             device->states[i].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID;
> +     }
> +
> +     strcpy(device->states[WAIT_CLK_ON].name, "WFI 0");
> +     strcpy(device->states[WAIT_CLK_ON].desc, "Wait with clock on");
> +     strcpy(device->states[WAIT_CLK_OFF].name, "WFI 1");
> +     strcpy(device->states[WAIT_CLK_OFF].desc, "Wait with clock off");
> +     strcpy(device->states[WAIT_CLK_OFF_POWER_OFF].name, "WFI 2");
> +     strcpy(device->states[WAIT_CLK_OFF_POWER_OFF].desc,
> +                     "Wait with clock off and power gating");
> +
> +     if (cpuidle_register_device(device)) {
> +             printk(KERN_ERR "imx_cpuidle_init: Failed registering\n");
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +late_initcall(imx_cpuidle_init);

We have a late_initcall here which needs to be protected from other
cpus. On the other hand we depend on board code calling
imx_cpuidle_board_params() before this initcall. I think the board code
should call a imx_cpuidle_init(struct imx_cpuidle_params
*cpuidle_params) instead which makes the flow of execution more clear.
Also, the function should be named mx51_cpuidle_init().

Then, I assume the best way might be that remove imx_cpuidle_board_params(), and let board code call mx51_cpuidle_init(), at the same time the params can be passed in by the same funciton. 

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e5ba495
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/*
> + * arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpuidle.h
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +enum {
> +     WAIT_CLK_ON,            /* c1 */
> +     WAIT_CLK_OFF,           /* c2 */
> +     WAIT_CLK_OFF_POWER_OFF, /* c3 */
> +     IMX_MAX_CPUIDLE_STATE,
> +};
> +
> +struct imx_cpuidle_params {
> +     unsigned int latency;
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> +extern void imx_cpuidle_board_params(struct imx_cpuidle_params *cpuidle_params);
> +#else
> +inline void imx_cpuidle_board_params(struct imx_cpuidle_params *cpuidle_params)
> +{}
> +#endif
> +
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>

--
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |