On 05/17/2012 06:40 PM, Andy Green wrote:

On 17/05/12 17:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said:

On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:

Greetings,

So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro tree since the 12.04 release.
(The generic topic updates were being done to the
linux-linaro-core-tracking tree)

Now it is time to move the focus to the linux-linaro tree. For one week
it will use the mainline tip as the base.

What happened to this?

I had some minor conflicts and build failures, so kept the updated tree locally for a while.

linux-linaro hasn't changed for 4 weeks now, so our vexpress 'tracking'
builds of Android and Ubuntu are in fact the same kernels as the 12.04
release.

It doesn't matter as long as llct is moving - and it has been, Andrey is
doing a really nice job. If we can get all the LTs to base on llct, and
get all the important things standardized in llct, then everything will
come right.

Actually, it (not moving linux-linaro forward for too long) was my fault.. Have pushed to the linux-linaro some time ago (no Samsung LT topics added yet).
BTW, for llct I've added the linux-linaro-core-tracking-v3.4-rc7 tag just in case the v3.4-rc7 tree is needed. As llct tip has moved beyond v3.4-rc7.

Nobody cares that we glued a couple dozen patches from ARM LT on one
other LT tree as a one-off.

linux-linaro tree is used by some CI jobs. To have the 12.05 stuff being tested in LAVA and such, I should have updated the linux-linaro tree as early as possible.

Thanks,
Andrey

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev