On Aug 6, 2013 11:06 PM, "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 21:12 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
> > On 6 August 2013 20:47, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:52AM +0800, Andy Green wrote:
>
> > >> 6) warning-elimination: nobody uses cci_pmu_destroy
> > >
> > >> Presumably coming from the CCI stuff Tixy pulled in
> > >
> > > I'll apply this but please do send it to the ARM LT, we should be fixing
> > > this stuff in linux-linaro too.
> >
> > Tixy's on the list and hopefully able to process these newfangled
> > attachments with his steampunk email client.
>
> I'd mostly stopped reading this thread but somehow managed to notice
> this. A proper mailed patch to the list, or a quick mail to me would
> have been more obvious ;-) I went back to the the original mail and

Yes fair enough.  I can just see the mail telling me to post them on linaro-kernel though.

> scrolled down to the bottom to find the attachments in my steampunk
> email client, and I'll add that to my CCI topic branch.

Thanks.

> The PMU support is a Frankenstein creation cobbled together from
> previous patches and intended to keep CCI support in Gator working.
> There are newer patches on the upstream lists which may break things
> again, but I've sorta stopped pro-actively trying to keep my branches
> up-to-date with latest work, as I don't seem to have the time any more
> and it seems a forlorn task. Especially as a lot of it seems under
> constant churn as people ague about how things should look. Best to just
> wait for it to turn up in mainline and deal with it them.

That may not be a bad approach.  There were those patches a while back that killed various things like perf that crept in llct, it's a sign that unless there's some pedigree or direct support behind where the series came from it might be better to be without them.

-Andy

> --
> Tixy
>