In LNG you could end up with an interesting mix of preempt RT and deadline patches making the analysis and benchmarking interesting to interpret.
In addition there are discussions about adding zero overhead linux (ZOL) like features.

Mike

On Friday, May 17, 2013 6:08:20 AM UTC-4, David Rusling wrote:

Amit,
    an interesting proposal.  I think that most of the LNG steering committee is on this alias, but just in case, I'm adding them to it...
Dave

Amit Kucheria

17 May 2013 10:15

Hi all,

As part of our investigations into the Linux scheduler we've
interacted with Juri Lelli at the University of Pisa (cc'ed) who is
part of a group that is working on a DEADLINE scheduler[1] for
Linux[2].

While we're coming at this from a power managment angle[3], I suspect
that LEG and LNG already have real-world usecases that would benefit
from deadline scheduler found in other RTOSes.

So I think it makes sense to merge Juri's tree into linux-linaro going
forward to allow easier experimentation. Does LEG and LNG have any
interest in this at this point?

Juri has expressed an interest in maintaining a current branch of the
code that could be merged into our monthly release. In return, real
world usecases will improve his chances of getting the code merged
into mainline.

Regards,
Amit

[1] http://retis.sssup.it/?q=node/35
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/11/373
[3] Mostly involving discussions at this point, no real engineering
effort invested yet

_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list

linar...@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

--
David Rusling
CTO
Linaro Ltd

e.  david....@linaro.org

w.  http://www.linaro.org
Linaro: The future of Linux on ARM