On Friday 30 March 2012 06:23 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Colin,
>
> On Friday 16 March 2012 05:07 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Colin Cross <
ccross@android.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> * removed the coupled lock, replacing it with atomic counters
>>> * added a check for outstanding pokes before beginning the
>>> final transition to avoid extra wakeups
>>> * made the cpuidle_coupled struct completely private
>>> * fixed kerneldoc comment formatting
>>> * added a patch with a helper function for resynchronizing
>>> cpus after aborting idle
>>> * added a patch (not for merging) to add trace events for
>>> verification and performance testing
>>
>> I forgot to mention, this patch series is on v3.3-rc7, and will
>> conflict with the cpuidle timekeeping patches. If those go in first
>> (which is likely), I will rework this series on top of it. I left it
>> on v3.3-rc7 now to make testing easier.
>
> I have re-based your series against Len Browns
> next branch [1] which has time keeping and other cpuidle patches.
> Have also folded the CPU hotplug fix which I posted in the
> original coupled idle patch.
>
for last few weeks. This version series seems to work as intended
and found it pretty stable in my testing. Apart from the cpu