Hi Daniel,This patch looks correct to me.Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:The cpu parameter is no longer needed in nohz_balancer_kick, let's remove
the parameter.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 1f7ed1a..c647c45 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6517,7 +6517,7 @@ static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
* nohz_load_balancer CPU (if there is one) otherwise fallback to any idle
* CPU (if there is one).
*/
-static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu)
+static void nohz_balancer_kick(void)
{
int ilb_cpu;
@@ -6871,15 +6871,13 @@ static inline int on_null_domain(struct rq *rq)
*/
void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
{
- int cpu = rq->cpu;
-
/* Don't need to rebalance while attached to NULL domain */
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->next_balance) &&
likely(!on_null_domain(rq)))
raise_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
if (nohz_kick_needed(rq) && likely(!on_null_domain(rq)))
- nohz_balancer_kick(cpu);
+ nohz_balancer_kick();
#endif
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/